Posts

ICCVE

4th International Conference on Connected Vehicles and Expo (ICCVE) 2015

ICCVE 2015 is the world’s premier Connected Vehicles conference that gathers all the relevant communities together. During the 5-day conference, experts, practitioners and policymakers from all around the world will present the latest innovations and advances on connected vehicles, share the experience and insights, forecast the trends and opportunities, and discuss the policy, economics and social implications.

This year the conference will be held in Shenzhen China with the specific venue TBD.

Topics of interest include, but are not limited to:

  • Wireless Communications and Vehicular Networking
  • Mobile Internet, Mobility Internet and Internet of Things
  • Cooperative Driving, Intelligent and Autonomous Vehicles
  • Automotive Electronics and Automatic Control
  • Transportation and Connected Vehicles
  • Electric Vehicle and Transportation Electrification
  • Geographic, Spatial and Social Information Systems
  • Manufacturing and Prouct Safety Engineering in Connected Vehicles
  • Practices, Recommendations and Standards in Connected Vehicles
  • Policy, Economics and Social Implications of Connected Vehicles

 

RenesasCar2015b

Renesas Launches Autonomous-Driving Platform for Developers

Burney Simpson

A fleet of cars using a new comprehensive platform for creating, building and testing autonomous driving technology is now available for viewing and test drives at the Renesas DevCon 2015, the conference organized by Renesas Electronics America.

The autos feature eight LiDAR, five radar, forward smart cameras, a Vehicle to Everything (V2X) box, and other technology that is becoming a core part of autonomous vehicles worldwide.

Renesas’ Autonomous Driving Development Platform includes a fleet of cars that can be operated as a modular and open laboratory for the auto industry. Renesas collaborated on the project with autonomous technology firms Harbrick, NewFoundry, Arada Systems, eTrans Systems, and Cogent Embedded.

Renesas DevCon began yesterday and runs through Thursday at the Hyatt Regency Orange County in Anaheim, Calif.

“Advanced automotive systems for cars are complex to develop and carry a heavy burden of responsibility,” said Amrit Vivekanand, vice president of the automotive business unit at Renesas. “We are building vehicle-level platforms that address customer and partner engineering challenges.”

The platform can be used as a “working sandbox in real-world environments” by “algorithm experts, sensor makers, system integrators, and other subject matter experts” so they can “collaborate, validate, experiment” and benchmark new ideas, Renesas announced.

Vehicles using the new platform integrate such autonomous driving technology as sensor fusion, forward camera image recognition, 3D surround view, and V2X communications. It is powered by Renesas microcontrollers, System on Chips (SoC), and semiconductors.

The platform uses Harbrick’s PolySync system, a development system that uses two Renesas R-Car H2 SOCs. Cogent Embedded provided 3D surround view and forward lane detection systems. Arada and eTrans provided Vehicle-to-Vehicle (V2V) and Vehicle-to-Infrastructure (V2I) systems that run on two channels of 5.9 GHz dedicated short-range communications (DSRC).

Renesas reported it plans to expand the technology to offer cockpit, safety, security, and powertrain platforms.

eTransBooth2

ITS California Buzzes on DOT Grants, Autonomous Levels Concept

John Estrada

The annual meeting of ITS California was held last week in Southern California.  The major buzz at the show was the previous week’s announcement by the US DOT that initial winners in grants for next-generation V2V and V2I technology were proposals from New York, Florida and Wyoming.  Many of the participants at the show felt very strongly that an award should have gone to California. It will be interesting to see what if any of those winning projects get off the ground.

There were quite a few interesting speakers at the show.  A couple of highlights included:

Greg Larson from CalTrans who led a panel that considered whether bus and truck automation should come before auto automation. Greg presented a chart from Richard Bishop of Bishop Consulting that showed the various levels of automation leading to autonomous cars as described by the SAE. Rather than a detailed description of what makes a vehicle fit into various levels, Richard describes it as follows:

  • Level 0: hands and feet ON;
  • Level 1: hands or feet OFF;
  • Level 2: hands and feet OFF, eyes ON;
  • Level 3: hands, feet, eyes OFF, brain on;
  • Level 4: hands, feet, eyes, brain OFF - Constrained environments;
  • Level 5: hands, feet, eyes, brain OFF – Unconstrained.
This seems like a great way to both remember and understand them.
Other interesting presentations included Aravind Kailas of Volvo who discussed truck automation and the future of mobility. He made a strong case as to why we are headed toward a world of shared mobility.
There was also an interesting panel on cybersecurity that gave the audience a true sense of the diversity and depth of the issue. Ed Fok from US DOT showed how easy it is easy to block off Internet access while Dominic Nessi of the LA Airport discussed cybersecurity challenges at a large, international airport. Gary Miskell from the Santa Clara Valley Transit Authority discussed the issues facing transit authorities and the challenges of securing a mobile fleet of public buses.

There were also a series of demonstrations of connected vehicle technologies from eTrans Systems, Econolite, Bosch and Arada Systems.

This was our second year at the show and in that short time it was clear how quickly technology is advancing in the work of Intelligent Transportation.

BusStop1

Silicon Valley Buses Adopt DSRC and V2I to Speed Rides, Cut Fuel Use

Burney Simpson

Riding the bus isn’t usually high-tech but a new app in Silicon Valley designed to make public bus operations more efficient is using Dedicated Short Range Communication (DSRC) to conduct Vehicle-to-Infrastructure (V2I) communication.

Arada Systems teamed with eTrans Systems to develop the computer-enabled Smart Stop that gives waiting commuters the capability to send a request to the bus driver that they want to be picked up. Smart Stop was developed with the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Agency, the county agency that operates the buses.

The VTA is implementing Smart Stop to make its bus routes more efficient and to lower fuel use.

“Connected vehicle technologies can contribute significantly to creating a simplified ridership experience, allowing buses to communicate with passengers at bus stops to ensure no passenger is missed yet only stopping when there is a passenger for the specific route to save fuel,” said Gary Miskell, chief information officer with the VTA.

Bus stops will be equipped with a hardened mobile computer with a 10-inch touch screen that can conduct V2I communication with a moving bus by using the DSRC wave length.

Fairfax, Va.-based eTrans specializes in the development and security of connected vehicle systems. Clients include automotive, transit, insurance and academic institutions.

eTrans Systems is pleased to lead the smart-stop project with the VTA and Arada Systems,” said John Estrada, CEO of eTrans. “Smart-Stop will both improve and increase ridership in Silicon Valley.”

“Arada Systems is pleased to partner with VTA to promote smart ridership”, said Praveen Singh, CEO of Arada Systems, Inc., “Our goal is to show the while DSRC is imperative for vehicle safety, it can also be used for other smart applications like Smart-Stop.” “

Vehicle to Infrastructure technology allows vehicles to interact with each other when travelling at high-speeds, providing drivers warnings about potential hazards, and possibly avoiding accidents. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) projects that this kind of advanced communication can reduce up to 80 percent of the vehicle crashes in the U.S.

Troy, Mich.-based Arada Systems develops, licenses and provides end to end solutions for the next generation connected and semi-autonomous vehicle technologies.

Photo: Tri Met Bus by Swong95765, 2014.

D20Sept11b

Growing Driverless Stock Index (D20) Reflects Dynamic Industry

Driverless Transportation

We have some exciting changes in the Driverless Transportation D20 Index to announce. First off, we are replacing three companies in the index and making the D20 more international in scope. We also changed the basis for our calculation of the D20 Index, moving to a dollar averaged approach.

The three new stocks in the D20 are:

  1.  Amsterdam-based TomTom (TOM2) is traded on the Amsterdam Stock Exchange. It replaces Nokia (NOK) which is selling its Here mapping division, its only business involved in driverless or connected vehicles. TomTom, known for its popular aftermarket GPS turn-by-turn directional devices for cars, has three units that are involved with driverless technology – the auto unit provides components such as maps, traffic and software to auto OEMs; the licensing group leverages maps, traffic and navigation content and services; and the telematics unit is dedicated to fleet management and vehicle telematics.
  2. Ontario, Canada-based Magna International (MGA) is traded on the NYSE. It replaces the lightly-traded KVH Inc. (KVHI), a business that primarily delivers ISP services for hotels, resorts and ships. Magna has a large and growing electronics division which focuses on driver assistance systems, as well as systems to support power-train electrification. It manufactures electronic, electromechanical and mechatronic products, and provides software and hardware development.
  3. Tokyo-based Renesas Electronics (TYO: 6723) trades on the Tokyo Stock Exchange. It replaces Iteris (ITI), a lightly-traded firm that provides intelligent transportation systems for municipalities. Renesas was formed through a merger of NEC Electronics Corp., and Renesas Technology Corp., (a joint venture of Hitachi and Mitsubishi Electric). Renesas Electronics is a semiconductor manufacturer that designs, develops, manufactures, sells and services microcontrollers for the automotive industry.

The D20 Index now has companies — TomTom in Amsterdam and Renesas in Tokyo — with stocks that are primarily listed on non-US exchanges and use foreign currencies for prices. To calculate the D20 and include these stocks we convert the non-US stock prices (Euros and Japanese Yen) to US dollars using a current conversion ratio. The values were: Euro – currently 1.136 dollars per Euro; and Japanese Yen – currently .00829 dollars per Yen.

CALCULATING THE INDEX

We have changed the basis for calculating the D20 Index. Previously, the value of the D20 was calculated by using one share of stock from each of the 20 stocks in the index. With the new dollar-averaged approach we track the value of $1,000 invested in each of the 20 stocks. And on August 28, 2015 we started with roughly a total of $20,000 invested equally in the 20 stocks ($1,000 per company) in the D20 Index.

 

Name

 

Symbol

(As of 8/28/2015)
Share Price Shares Currency Conversion Value
BlackBerry Ltd BBRY $             7.37 135.690 1.000 $           1,000
BYD COMPANY LTD ADR BYDDY $             8.44 118.480 1.000 $           1,000
Continental AG (ADR) CTTAY $           42.86 23.330 1.000 $           1,000
Daimler AG (USA) DDAIF $           80.70 12.390 1.000 $           1,000
Delphi Automotive PLC DLPH $           75.35 13.270 1.000 $           1,000
Denso Corp (ADR) DNZOY $           22.69 44.070 1.000 $           1,000
Ford Motor Company F $           13.73 72.830 1.000 $           1,000
General Motors Company GM $           29.01 34.470 1.000 $           1,000
Google Inc GOOG $       630.38 1.586 1.000 $           1,000
Magna MGA $           49.23 20.313 1.000 $           1,000
Mobileye NV Amsterdam MBLY $           56.42 17.724 1.000 $           1,000
Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. (ADR) NSANY $           18.31 54.620 1.000 $           1,000
NVIDIA Corporation NVDA $           22.73 43.990 1.000 $           1,000
Tesla Motors Inc TSLA $       248.48 4.025 1.000 $           1,000
TomTom TOM2 €             8.97 100.010 1.115 $           1,000
Visteon Corp VC $       100.49 9.950 1.000 $           1,000
VALEO SA (ADR) VLEEF $           63.66 15.710 1.000 $           1,000
Volkswagen AG (ADR) VLKPY $           38.32 26.100 1.000 $           1,000
Volvo AB (ADR) VOLVY $           10.94 91.410 1.000 $           1,000
Renesas TYO:6732 ¥       708.00 168.008 0.00841 $           1,000

Why the change? We found that with the one-share approach the stocks with the highest prices, i.e., Google, trading over $600, and Tesla, over $250, could swing the D20 wildly with just a small change in their pricing. The dollar-average approach means each company in the D20 now makes up about five percent of the index’s underlying value.

Why didn’t the D20 Index change radically when we switched the basis? We have always used a divisor with the D20 Index, and it started as 10.0. That meant we added up all the stock prices at the close of the trading day and divided by 10. To switch to the new dollar-average approach we changed the divisor so the new D2’s underlying value would be the same as the old D2. So on August 28, 2015 we used the closing stock prices to find the value of each of the two D20s, then adjusted the divisor for the dollar-averaged D20 so it had the same value as the old D20. The new divisor is 134.27296.

On September 4 we switched over to the revised D20 Index with the three new stocks and the new divisor.

Visit the Driverless Transportation D20 Stock Index page to learn more about it and its component stocks.

VolvTruck1

Peloton Takes the Lead in Truck Platooning

Burney Simpson

You know who’s hot? Peloton.

Consider this – in April, the firm was the beneficiary of a $16 million investment led by Japanese auto-parts supplier Denso and Intel Capital, with participation by Castrol innoVentures, Magna International, UPS Strategic Enterprise Fund, Volvo Venture Capital Group, and several Silicon Valley-based venture investors.

Gӧran Nyberg, president of Volvo Trucks North America, said in a statement that Peloton’s platooning “will improve safety and fuel efficiency” and lead to lower costs.

Trucks use platooning technology like radar and wireless vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V) and wireless vehicle-to-infrastructure (V2X) communication to travel closely with each other, and take advantage of aerodynamics to save on fuel.

The communications systems allow the rear truck to automatically accelerate or brake with the lead truck, improving safety and allowing for closer travel. Studies of platooning trucks have found that fuel costs can be reduced between 7 and 12 percent for the following truck and nearly 5 percent for the lead truck.

In addition, evolving technology could mean the second or third truck in a pack would be operated by the lead truck, and would not need a driver, further cutting costs. However, platooning proponents insist that at this time the following trucks all have drivers, and that these drivers could take control of their vehicle if a situation warrants it.

Mountain View, Calif.-based Peloton is developing a cloud-based operations center that monitors the trucks in its system, and warns them when weather or road conditions might impact their driving.

There was more good news for Peloton when the Utah legislature enacted a bill allowing the testing of connected vehicles in the state (See “Three States Approve Autonomous Vehicle Legislation”). Peloton has demonstrated its technology in the state with truck firm C.R. England.

Peloton is part of the truck-platooning study in Utah conducted by American Transportation Research Institute and Auburn University that also includes Peterbilt Trucks and Meritor Wabco.

dotCollage2

Driverless Trans Part of DOT Budget Battle

Burney Simpson

Driverless transportation came to the fore last week as Congress considered President Obama’s 2016 budget request for the U.S. Department of Transportation. Proponents took the fight to voters, traveling out of Washington to convince the public to support the $95 billion proposal.

As part of that Obama asked Congress for $935 million over six years for the line item on autonomous driving technology called ‘Intelligent Transportation Systems & Automation Research Acceleration,’ (see pages 6 and 10 in this DOT Budget Highlights pdf).

DOT Secretary Anthony Foxx went to Silicon Valley last week, appearing at Delphi Labs in Mountain View, Calif., and arguing for his Beyond Traffic 2045 concept first launched in February.

Foxx pushed for greater road-related communication infrastructure, including requiring vehicle to vehicle (V2V) communication in all new cars. Foxx said he plans to send the rule request to federal regulators before the end of this year, speeding up the rule-making process from his previous plan.

The DOT’s National Highway Traffic Safety Administration is working with the Federal Communication Commission to test dedicated short-range communications (DSRC) standards in the 5.9GHz spectrum. The wireless protocols are used for V2V and vehicle to infrastructure (V2I) communications.

It’s not clear if driverless technology is a headline grabber that encourages voters to contact their elected officials to get behind the proposed budget. In the 1980s President Ronald Reagan drew widespread public backing for funding of his ‘Star Wars’ weapons shield in space that he said would protect America from nuclear rockets sent from the Soviet Union.

STATE INFRASTRUCTURE

Meanwhile, in Pennsylvania, construction unions joined with former Gov. Ed Rendell to publicize funding requests for transportation and infrastructure. The unions would like to raise the state gas tax to pay for the repair and construction of roads and bridges. Proponents say the gas tax was last increased in 1994.

Other states are raising their gas tax. Iowa implemented an increase in March, its first since 1984, and last week the Nebraska legislature overrode the governor’s veto to enact an increase that will start next year.

A recent article in the Harvard Business Review contends that giant transportation projects will only be completed if leaders build collaboration among a mix of supporters. In ‘Too Many Infrastructure Projects go it Alone’ author Rosabeth Moss Kanter writes,

“Systemic problems that affect everyone but are beyond the ability of any one person to solve require collaboration skills. To renew and reinvent our aging transportation infrastructure, we must turn our attention to coalition-building. Classic leadership lessons apply.

To create the conditions that support innovation, leaders need to build connections across companies, industries, and sectors.”

Kanter points to a number of successful collaborative projects including the 32-acre M City autonomous-vehicle test bed set to officially open this July in Ann Arbor, Mich. That project grew in part due to the coming together of major automakers, Google, the University of Michigan, the state DOT, and other interested parties, Kanter writes.

StateStatusApril15

Three States Approve Autonomous Vehicle Legislation

Burney Simpson

Three states this year enacted legislation to advance autonomous or connected vehicles, while legislators in nine states are still considering such proposals.

North Dakota approved a plan that would allow the testing of autonomous vehicles. Tennessee banned its counties and cities from banning autonomous vehicles as long as they are as safe as standard vehicles. Utah will conduct tests on connected vehicles.

One solid source for state legislation related to driverless transportation is a website maintained by the Stanford Center for Internet and Society. The pages on Legislative and Regulatory Action follow these developments and provide links to pertinent proposals. However, updates to the site can be slow. (The graphic here is the Center’s latest map tracking developments).

It is difficult to predict whether any of the nine states still considering proposals will pass anything. In state legislatures, proposals shunted off to a committee typically expire. However, it is not unknown that a proposal sitting in a committee for months will suddenly be revived, passed, and signed by the governor.

When monitoring state legislation — never count on anything, nor count anything out.

According to the Center’s updates, the following states took the lead on autonomous-vehicle legislation during their recent sessions:

Connecticut – Rep. Christie M. Carpino, a Republican from Cromwell, Portland, is the sponsor of HB 6344, a proposal that would allow the testing of autonomous vehicles. It has been stuck in committee for months.

GeorgiaSB 113 is sponsored by Sen. Joshua McKoon, a Republican from Columbus. This proposal would create a new class of autonomous vehicles and allow for their testing on public roads. The bill passed through committee but has been hanging around the Senate since February.

Idaho – The Senate in March approved by a one-vote margin S1108 that would allow for the testing of autonomous vehicles on public roads. It was sent to the House and hasn’t been heard from since. Sen. Bert Brackett, a Republican from Rogerson, sponsored the bill.

Illinois – The House in April passed unanimously HB 3136, a proposal allowing the testing of autonomous cars on public roads. The legislation must be passed by the full Senate where it is sponsored by Sen. Martin A. Sandoval, a Democrat from Cicero. This one may still have a chance.

MassachusettsHouse Bill 2977 creates some definitions for autonomous vehicles, and allows for their testing on public roads. Sponsor is Rep. Peter J. Durant, a Republican from Spencer. Nothing has happened on this one since January when it was sent to the Joint Committee on Transportation.

Missouri – Rep. Delus Johnson is sponsoring HB 924 that would allow testing of driverless vehicles for three years beginning this August. Nothing shaking here since a March committee hearing.

New Jersey – The Senate passed S734 that would direct the state Motor Vehicle Commission to set rules for the operation of autonomous vehicles. The House may consider twin bill A1326 before it adjourns.

New York – Proposal A31 is sitting in the Transportation Committee of the New York Assembly. Sponsor Rep. David F. Gantt, a Democrat from Rochester, wants to allow the testing of autonomous vehicles.

North Dakota – Legislators approved a measure to study automated vehicles, and Gov. Jack Dalrymple signed it on March 20.

Oregon – A proposal in the Senate would create a process to certify manufacturers to test, sell, and operate autonomous vehicles in Oregon. Sen. Sara Gelser, a Democrat from Corvallis is the chief sponsor of SB 620, which is sitting in the Business and Transportation Committee.

Tennessee – Gov. Bill Haslam signed into law in April a bill that prohibits any political body in the state from prohibiting autonomous vehicles if the vehicles meet all the state’s safety regulations.

Utah – Gov. Gary Herbert signed in March a bill authorizing the state Department of Transportation to conduct a test of connected vehicle technology.

A Maryland proposal that once looked promising was shot down before crossing the finish line. The House wanted to spend $200,000 to study autonomous vehicles but a Senate committee said no as the state looks to cut spending.

At this time only California, Florida, Michigan, Nevada and the District of Columbia have passed legislation allowing for the operation of autonomous vehicles. The National Highway Transportation Safety Administration has issued regulation guidelines on the topic for states.

University of Pennsylvania UPenn

What this ‘Impact’ Specialist says about Autonomous Transportation

Darcy Conlin

Hayeri

Yeganeh Mashayekh Hayeri, Ph.D.

This featured article takes a look at some of the work going on in Pennsylvania in conjunction with University of Pennsylvania (UPenn) and the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (PennDOT). Yeganeh Mashayekh Hayeri is a post-doctorate research fellow at UPenn who works with the GRASP lab (General Robotics, Automation, Sensing & Perception). She was a researcher at Carnegie Mellon University (CMU) with USDOT T-SET UTC (Technologies for Safe and Efficient Transportation). Hayeri’s projects are funded by UTC.

We frequently hear about what is happening within the driverless industry in states like California and Nevada. Hayeri has experience working in both of these states but now finds herself in Pennsylvania.

The juxtaposition between geography is just one of the challenges that needs to be sorted out within this industry. Hayeri is working to help educate people about the overall impact that the evolving autonomous industry will have on our transportation system. This emerging technology is creating a paradigm shift in the way we think about issues relating to transportation regardless of what coast you live on, or whether you are north or south of the Mason-Dixon line.

There is a lot going on in Pennsylvania. Let’s start by acknowledging that last November, CMU celebrated the 30th birthday of self-driving car technology and has touted itself as the birthplace of self-driving cars. That’s right – Pennsylvania, not Mountain View, Calif.

Also, the GRASP lab where Hayeri finds herself these days is a vital and cooperative environment fostering interaction between students, research staff and faculty. GRASP is a $10-million research center founded in 1979 and, according to Hayeri, is exactly what you would think from the acronym. There are all kinds of things happening in robotics, automation and perception — all necessary concepts for research related to automated transportation systems.

One of the recent projects Hayeri worked on was the “Connected and Autonomous Vehicles - 2040 Vision” project with PennDOT. This one-year visionary project examined the impact that these new technologies would have on the state’s investment decisions, infrastructure, workforce training, driver licensing, and communications systems. Concluding this past July, the project took a high-level qualitative analysis of various impacts from these technologies.

With the focus on Pittsburgh, one of the short-term action items was to allocate funding for and identify key locations for dedicated short-range communication (DSRC) and roadside equipment deployment. Between 2016 and 2020 the project proposes early, small-scale deployment of vehicle to infrastructure (V2I) applications at these key locations. The longer-term plans include working with local and state educational institutions to enhance workforce training, along with tailoring certain features to the trucking industry. This graPennDot Actionsphic spells out the proposed actions arising from the project.

 

Fundamentally, all DOTs want to create a sustainable transportation system that will prepare them for the future. By working with PennDOT, Hayeri hopes to bridge the gap between collaborating with local communities and educating both state planners and locals on individual needs and concerns.

 

Her latest project, while still within the automated transportation world, has a bit of a twist to it.

With the help of UPenn’s Department of Electrical and Systems Engineering, Hayeri and her colleagues are modeling human behavior while driving using inverse reinforcement learning techniques. In simple terms, reinforcement learning looks at the behavior of an agent (the driver), his utility and reward functions, and his actions in an environment.

Hayeri chose traffic engineering as a career because she is fascinated by human psychology and its impact on traffic operations and planning, something she believes has been missing from much of the previous models and theories. While staying present behind the wheel has always been crucial, driver distraction today has reached saturation.

With inverse reinforcement learning techniques the hope is to evaluate enforced policies, like speed limit rules, and their effectiveness. What type of a reward function drivers use to make driving decisions is the key element to Hayeri’s current research. Her goal is to understand how people set up these reward functions internally and how they react.

According to Hayeri, “The goal is to gauge the effectiveness of a policy or a combination of policies by modeling humans’ behavior and examining the patterns. This research should assist decision and policy makers to set informed and effective policies as we enter the automated transportation era.”

There are many challenges ahead. One is the legislative policy toward autonomous transportation and driving that each state DOT, along with the US DOT, will need to work out. The new regulations and their enforcement, and the interaction between the states and the federal government in policing this technology, will all have to be determined. Then there is the challenge of states in different regions and how they will address difficult weather such as snow and fog.

Behaviorally there are questions about how drivers of automated vehicles will interact with automated features, and how drivers of conventional vehicles will interact with driverless vehicles.

Hayeri is passionate about contemplating ways to bridge the gap between our traditional way of thinking about transportation, and transitioning to the future with connected and autonomous vehicles. Looking at current human behavior and what people’s perceptions of autonomous vehicles are is a necessary task. The differences in individuals, what they are willing to accept and how quickly they can change their current patterns of behavior will all have an impact on how this will evolve.

In her own words, Hayeri thinks of herself as an “impact specialist,” and is wondering if, as a culture, we are ready to let go of our cars – a question she is not alone in contemplating. We look forward to seeing what else comes down the Pennsylvania Turnpike.

Events

Nothing Found

Sorry, no posts matched your criteria