Posts

Connectedurban1

FTC Reports on Security, Connected Vehicles and the IoT

Burney Simpson

Connected vehicles are part of a new report from the U.S. Federal Trade Commission focusing on safeguarding privacy and security of the growing number of business and consumers that use the Internet of Things (IoT).

Connected vehicles have become an important part of the IoT as auto manufacturers integrate autonomous driving technology that uses the Internet for Vehicle-to-Vehicle (V2V) and Vehicle-to-Infrastructure (V2I) communications. Connected vehicle technology offers more efficient, safer driving, and has drawn the attention of fleet operators, trucking firms, insurance companies, consumers and many others.

Other major industries impacted by the IoT include healthcare, housing, and energy.

The FTC report “internet of things: Privacy & Security in a Connected World” explains that potential security risks arising from the IoT include the unauthorized access and misuse of personal information, attacks on other systems, and risks to personal safety. Privacy risks “may flow from the collection of personal information, habits, locations, and physical conditions over time.” A PDF of the report is available.

Despite these dangers, the FTC has decided that IoT-specific legislation is not needed at this time, but that industries should consider creating self-regulatory programs designed to encourage the adoption of privacy- and security-sensitive practices.

The FTC has defined the IoT as “devices or sensors – other than computers, smartphones, or tablets – that connect, store or transmit information with or between each other via the Internet.”

The report is limited to IoT devices sold to or used by consumers. It is based on the FTC’s Internet of Things workshop held in Washington, D.C. in November, 2013, and on public comments following the workshop.

The FTC also released a new reference guide on privacy and security for businesses that develop communications-oriented technology designed to become a part of the IoT. “Careful Connections: Building Security in the Internet of Things” offers a brief approach to building products and services for the IoT that include proper authentication, security measures, and well-thought-out default settings. Careful Connections is available as a free download.

In a checklist for developers, the FTC recommends they design their products with authentication in mind, protect the interfaces between their product and other devices or services, consider how to limit permissions, take advantage of readily available security tools, test the security measures before launching the product, and selecting the secure choice as your default setting.

University of Pennsylvania UPenn

What this ‘Impact’ Specialist says about Autonomous Transportation

Darcy Conlin

Hayeri

Yeganeh Mashayekh Hayeri, Ph.D.

This featured article takes a look at some of the work going on in Pennsylvania in conjunction with University of Pennsylvania (UPenn) and the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (PennDOT). Yeganeh Mashayekh Hayeri is a post-doctorate research fellow at UPenn who works with the GRASP lab (General Robotics, Automation, Sensing & Perception). She was a researcher at Carnegie Mellon University (CMU) with USDOT T-SET UTC (Technologies for Safe and Efficient Transportation). Hayeri’s projects are funded by UTC.

We frequently hear about what is happening within the driverless industry in states like California and Nevada. Hayeri has experience working in both of these states but now finds herself in Pennsylvania.

The juxtaposition between geography is just one of the challenges that needs to be sorted out within this industry. Hayeri is working to help educate people about the overall impact that the evolving autonomous industry will have on our transportation system. This emerging technology is creating a paradigm shift in the way we think about issues relating to transportation regardless of what coast you live on, or whether you are north or south of the Mason-Dixon line.

There is a lot going on in Pennsylvania. Let’s start by acknowledging that last November, CMU celebrated the 30th birthday of self-driving car technology and has touted itself as the birthplace of self-driving cars. That’s right – Pennsylvania, not Mountain View, Calif.

Also, the GRASP lab where Hayeri finds herself these days is a vital and cooperative environment fostering interaction between students, research staff and faculty. GRASP is a $10-million research center founded in 1979 and, according to Hayeri, is exactly what you would think from the acronym. There are all kinds of things happening in robotics, automation and perception — all necessary concepts for research related to automated transportation systems.

One of the recent projects Hayeri worked on was the “Connected and Autonomous Vehicles - 2040 Vision” project with PennDOT. This one-year visionary project examined the impact that these new technologies would have on the state’s investment decisions, infrastructure, workforce training, driver licensing, and communications systems. Concluding this past July, the project took a high-level qualitative analysis of various impacts from these technologies.

With the focus on Pittsburgh, one of the short-term action items was to allocate funding for and identify key locations for dedicated short-range communication (DSRC) and roadside equipment deployment. Between 2016 and 2020 the project proposes early, small-scale deployment of vehicle to infrastructure (V2I) applications at these key locations. The longer-term plans include working with local and state educational institutions to enhance workforce training, along with tailoring certain features to the trucking industry. This graPennDot Actionsphic spells out the proposed actions arising from the project.

 

Fundamentally, all DOTs want to create a sustainable transportation system that will prepare them for the future. By working with PennDOT, Hayeri hopes to bridge the gap between collaborating with local communities and educating both state planners and locals on individual needs and concerns.

 

Her latest project, while still within the automated transportation world, has a bit of a twist to it.

With the help of UPenn’s Department of Electrical and Systems Engineering, Hayeri and her colleagues are modeling human behavior while driving using inverse reinforcement learning techniques. In simple terms, reinforcement learning looks at the behavior of an agent (the driver), his utility and reward functions, and his actions in an environment.

Hayeri chose traffic engineering as a career because she is fascinated by human psychology and its impact on traffic operations and planning, something she believes has been missing from much of the previous models and theories. While staying present behind the wheel has always been crucial, driver distraction today has reached saturation.

With inverse reinforcement learning techniques the hope is to evaluate enforced policies, like speed limit rules, and their effectiveness. What type of a reward function drivers use to make driving decisions is the key element to Hayeri’s current research. Her goal is to understand how people set up these reward functions internally and how they react.

According to Hayeri, “The goal is to gauge the effectiveness of a policy or a combination of policies by modeling humans’ behavior and examining the patterns. This research should assist decision and policy makers to set informed and effective policies as we enter the automated transportation era.”

There are many challenges ahead. One is the legislative policy toward autonomous transportation and driving that each state DOT, along with the US DOT, will need to work out. The new regulations and their enforcement, and the interaction between the states and the federal government in policing this technology, will all have to be determined. Then there is the challenge of states in different regions and how they will address difficult weather such as snow and fog.

Behaviorally there are questions about how drivers of automated vehicles will interact with automated features, and how drivers of conventional vehicles will interact with driverless vehicles.

Hayeri is passionate about contemplating ways to bridge the gap between our traditional way of thinking about transportation, and transitioning to the future with connected and autonomous vehicles. Looking at current human behavior and what people’s perceptions of autonomous vehicles are is a necessary task. The differences in individuals, what they are willing to accept and how quickly they can change their current patterns of behavior will all have an impact on how this will evolve.

In her own words, Hayeri thinks of herself as an “impact specialist,” and is wondering if, as a culture, we are ready to let go of our cars – a question she is not alone in contemplating. We look forward to seeing what else comes down the Pennsylvania Turnpike.

NeoBridge, LLC

IoT Connected Vehicle Testbed in My Backyard

Ann-Marie Johnson

Courtesy of Ann-Marie Johnson, President at NeoBridge

Connected Vehicles

Image Courtesy of U.S. DOT

 

Unbeknownst to me, I have been driving nearly daily on a connected- vehicle and connected-infrastructure testbed. How cool to discover that an Internet of Things (IoT) pilot is running on a road I regularly travel!

The four square mile test bed is located just outside the Capital Beltway in Fairfax County, Virginia. For the DC area locals, it’s the stretch of I-66 between Nutley Street and the Beltway and parallel sections on Rt. 29 and Rt. 50. This map shows the 43 roadside equipment (RSE) locations and two additional wireless mobile units.

Map courtesy of Connected Vehicle/Infrastructure University Transportation Center

The Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) explained this location was selected because of its transportation challenges: high crash rates, poor air quality, and congestion. Yep! All true!

A second testbed, which is a closed highway, was also opened in 2012 in Southwest Virginia in Blacksburg, near Virginia Tech’s Transportation Institute. In addition to Virginia Tech, the University of Virginia (UVA), and Morgan State are all participating via the Connected Vehicle/Infrastructure University Transportation Center (CVI-UTC). The U.S. Department of Transportation’s research arm also operates its own set of connected vehicle testbeds.

Funding for this project includes $6 million from the federal government, $4 million from Virginia, $2M from Virginia Tech, and some other sources interested in better safety, air quality, less congestion, and less money on gas and infrastructure.

Ann-Marie JohnsonMy car is not equipped as are the twelve research vehicles plus a bus and semi-truck to collect information about acceleration, braking, emissions, and curve handling. Nor can my car receive information about stopped vehicles or dangerous road conditions ahead of me. The promise of the connected highway is really in my imagination and not a reality for me today.

Maybe my future car will be equipped to take advantage of vehicle to vehicle (V2V) and vehicle to infrastructure (V2I) capabilities blossoming as our physical and digital worlds merge. Even better, maybe that car will be self driving.

As a Northern Virginia resident, I welcome ways to reduce road congestion, improve air quality, and save me time and money on gas. I pay taxes, too, so maybe human ingenuity can innovate our way out of our historical solution for more highway capacity: more roads.

Transportation is necessary. With the IoT and some human ingenuity, we have a line of sight to more economical, environmentally safe, and quality of life solutions for the future.

Let’s get moving!

 

Ann-Marie Johnson is the founder of NeoBridge, a Washington, D.C. based advisory consulting firm that helps companies find new, profitable, sustainable revenue streams via innovative business models and disruptive technology such as internet of things, social, mobile, analytics, and cloud.  She was most recently with Computer Sciences Corporation (CSC) where she was the offering manager for an innovative predictive analytic for extreme weather events, co-founded a federal climate and energy practice that had a 16% CAGR when government funding was flat, booked over $1.75B in new revenues for CSC, and successfully managed a P&L with $50M annual revenue.

eTrans2020 Logo

eTrans2020 ITSWC Data Analysis

eTrans2020, Showcasing Cloud-based Services

The ITS World Congress in Detroit last month was an opportunity for U.S. DOT Affiliated Test Bed Member, eTrans2020, to showcase their cloud-based services. According to John Estrada, eTrans2020 CEO, “As our name implies, eTrans2020 is realizing the future of transportation built on cloud-based services.  Affiliated Test Bed membership and our active participation in the Southeastern Michigan V2X architecture gave us a front-row seat. We want to be the first to showcase the benefits and advantages of sending data to the cloud and making it available to a diverse set of public and private users.”

At ITS-WC, the USDOT made available several vehicles to demonstrate the benefit of V2V and V2I technology and cloud-based data. As part of this effort, the vehicles passed vehicle information, essentially copies of Basic Safety Messages (BSMs) up into the cloud to a data warehouse. Interested parties could then subscribe to the data warehouse and get access to the data. eTrans2020’s vision is to leverage this capability, which they demonstrated at ITS-WC.

Data Analysis and Refinement Process demonstrated

eTrans2020 specializes in software, data quality assurance and security. They have developed a suite of tools to gather and analyze this vehicle data with a focus on security. Over the course of about the five days of ITS-WC, almost 1.5 million records of BSM type messages were collected. During the show, the progress of these vehicles were tracked in real-time. The following picture, one of the key outputs of the USDOT Affiliated Test Bed program, shows the flow of data during the event.

Transportation Data Flow

The three steps for the data, as shown above, to access eTrans2020 were as follows:

  1. Each vehicle stored BSM information and passed it to the Connected Vehicle Wide Area Information Distributor
  2. From there it went to the Southeast Michigan Situation Data Clearing House
  3. In the third step, it flowed to eTrans2020 cloud based system which have previously subscribed to receive that type of information.

Once eTrans2020 received the information, it would begin to process it and display it. The following picture are examples of eTrans2020 displays that are used to monitor and process the information in real-time.

eTrans2020 Displays

For eTrans2020 though this is just the first step.  John noted, “As you would expect the raw data collected, as is, is just a starting point. We analyze the collected data to find anomalies with the data and potential issues with how the information is processed.  This is the guide to help us find the records or series of records where the information just doesn’t line up or warrants further investigation, what you might call a refinement process.” This initial step helps to identify:

  • Missing fields
  • Records out of sequence (where the timestamps go in reverse)
  • Records where the vehicle doesn’t know its position or where it reports a clearly incorrect position
  • Records coming too close together or too far apart
  • Anomalies with the reported speed or with a comparison of the reported speed with a calculated speed
  • Anomalies with the rate of change in elevation
  • Anomalies with reported and calculated heading.

The second step is to “qualify the data”, that is use a set of data analysis tools to understand the root cause of data issues or errors. Data needs to be “qualified”, that is either have any issues resolved or to flag the data for further investigation and refinement (e.g. generally additional data is needed).

What we have learned so far

eTrans2020 preliminary results have shown:

  • There are significant variations in how the individual vehicles operate.
  • The vehicles seem to “drift” at times, report incorrect data and then return.
  • In general, there isn’t an obvious pattern to the reporting timing
  • The issues tend to be inter-related

The figure below is a sample output from this process.

eTrans2020_Sample_Output

eTrans2020 and John’s team will provide the USDOT team a detailed presentation. Those interested in seeing the full report, please contact John Estrada at jestrada@etrans2020.com.

What’s Next?

eTrans2020 is also working on additional metrics to assess the ”quality” of their process.  Ultimately, they will score records as to data quality. As the data records are received, decisions therefore can be made on the usefulness of the data and the robustness of the security.

John concludes, “Security by design is an important design principle that needs to be evaluated. Leveraging cloud-based services is a new arena of development for the transportation industry and therefore has new challenges, namely security. We welcome the opportunities to be on “bleeding edge” of development.  We try out and test our new ideas at the various test beds, which gives us access to the emerging infrastructure.”

Arada Systems

Arada LocoMate Mini 2

Arada LocoMate Mini 2One of the new products launched at the ITSCA show last week was the Arada LocoMate Mini 2. This is a fully integrated DSRC On-Board unit for operation within vehicles. This is one of the, if not the, smallest units on the market. USB can be used to both connect the unit to the car and to power it. This device consists of DSRC Radios, Bluetooth and GPS, with two external DSRC antennas and one GPS antennas. GPS accuracy in the device is within 1 meter. The device is specifically designed for V2V and V2I safety and mobility applications that the NHTSA has indicated it will require in vehicles in the coming years. The product is designed for use with Automotive OEMs, Tier 1 suppliers, and Transit Authorities. The unit is currently operating in a number of pilot programs to test sending basic safety messages between cars, pedestrians, bicycles and pubic roadside infrastructure such as traffic signals. Click here for more information.

Arada_Connected_Vehicle_imageArada Systems specializes in Connected Vehicle Technology using Dedicated Short-Range communications, on the 5.9 Ghz Wireless Frequency and initiated by the US Department of Transportation as the public safety band with the lowest latency and an uninterrupted communications protocol.

ITSWorldCongress

ITS World Congress

John Estrada

The ITS (Intelligent Transport Systems) World Congress was held last week in Detroit.  This annual event rotates between North America, Asia and Europe so this is likely the largest ITS event in the US for quite some time.  (Actually for at least 6 years since in 3 years time it will be in Montreal).

ITSWC Tradeshow Floor

The event brought together a wide range of organizations from giant multi-nationals like Delphi, Nissan and Mercedes to relatively new companies like RideScout, eTrans2020 and zipcar.  In addition there were a number of government agencies, universities, research centers and pavilions for organizations all over the world including Australia, Singapore and Korea.  It was quite the gathering of the ITS talent and expertise.

ITSWC GM Pavilion

There were a number of major announcements and happenings at last week’s event.  A sampling of these include:

  • GM’s CEO, Mary Barra, announced that starting with the 2017 model year some Cadillac models will be equipped with GM’s Super Cruise automated driving function and that they would also contain DSRC radios for safety through connected vehicle (V2V) technology.
  • US Secretary of Transportation, Anthony Fox, reiterated the governments commitment to the use of V2V and V2I technologies for safety in future vehicles.
  • Honda provide test rides in their driverless car.
  • Delphi demonstrated their system that determines if the driver is paying attention.

A large part of the discussion the event centered around was how transportation is changing and how the options for people to get from one place to another are really changing.  This was a lesson that I wished I learned better for the show.  I was in Detroit from Sunday through Thursday.  I was staying downtown within walking distance of the convention center.  However, I had two meetings planned in the Detroit suburbs that week.  Being a product of the 1960’s and a life of mostly suburban living, I felt that I needed to rent a car.  This would get me to and from the airport and allow me to get out to the Detroit suburbs for my meetings.  Between the rental car and daily parking, I ended spending almost $350 in transportation.

A better and 21st century plan would have been to use RideScout or a tool like it to find a ride from the airport.  I’ve found this could be from $20 in a shared van to $50 for a ride with Uber.  When I needed to go to the suburbs, I could have rented a Zipcar for about $36.  Given that one of my meetings was cancelled and the other ended up happening in the city, I could have saved over $150.  Lesson learned for next time.

This is an exciting time in the world of transportation.  As could be seen at the ITS World Congress, the rate of change in transportation is accelerating quickly.  It is going to be exciting.

 

Events

Nothing Found

Sorry, no posts matched your criteria